Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Misha Gerrick's avatar

So true. I never trusted the idea of KU, so I've stayed wide, knowing it would take me longer to build up a following. Now, as I'm about to get into Book 3 of my one series, I'm REALLY glad I did that.

Maybe it's my educational background in investment management and economics, but I just never liked the idea of going exclusive.

Expand full comment
Erin Wright's avatar

This whole debate about who the boycott is hurting has been interesting for me to watch from the outside. There’s this idea that going Wide is almost a nonstarter. Why would you even do such a thing? KU requires exclusivity. You can’t sell your book anywhere else.

Yes, but……..

*whispering* Did you know you don’t have to enroll your books into KU? 🤯

I know, I know. Crazy idea right there.

“For many BIPOC, LGBTQ+, and disabled authors, Amazon provides one of the few accessible and equitable platforms to publish and reach readers without the barriers of traditional publishing."

Amazon…along with GooglePlay, BN, Kobo, Apple, libraries, Everand, Smashwords, loads of other small storefronts…

Amazon is only one of *many* places that you can publish your ebooks, and whether you can publish on Kobo or not doesn’t have a damn thing to do with you being a BIPOC, LGBTQ+, or disabled in any way. All of these platforms are equally as accessible to all authors, no matter your sexual orientation or skin color.

Anyway, I know you (Rachel) are recommending that people go Wide, or at least laying out that as a possibility for people to consider, and I appreciate it. 💙 I’m just starting to get pretty grumpy with so many of the KU authors out there who do not seem to understand that going Wide and publishing on all platforms is *absolutely* a valid option. They’ve seemingly discounted it out of the gate, and that’s insanely frustrating for authors like me. 😅

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts